- TLC last longer and are faster
- but also more expensive
- Which is better SLC MLC TLC QLC?
- lifespan + performance-wise:
- SLC
- MLC
- TLC
- QLC
- For comparison:
- SLCs are able to last up to 100,000 write cycles
- while QLCs even with improving technology, can only last up to 1,000 write cycles.) (src from 2019)
new tech: (SanDisk) 3D NAND
specs:
Allgemein: | |
---|---|
Chiptyp: | 3D-NAND TLC |
MTBF (Mean Time Before Failure): | 1.750.000 hours |
IOPS (Random 4K schreiben): | 84.000 |
2TB SanDisk Ultra 3D 2.5″ (6.4cm) SATA 6Gb/s 3D-NAND
So it is ALSO TLC technology (GOOD) and it comes with a 5 years warranty.
Kingston datacenter capable SSDs also utilize 3D TLC NAND
so it should be datacenter capable (high performance 24-7)
vs Samsung SSD 870 Evo Basic, 2 TB, SATA
MTBF 1,5 Millionen hours
Warranty: 5 years
Features: Intelligent TurnoWrite, TRIM, Garbage Collection, S.M.A.R.T, AES 256-bit Full Disk Encryption, TCG/Opal V2.0, Encrypted Drive(IEEE1667)
now what about MLC?
https://www.acnc.com/blog/solid-state-storage/mlc-vs-tlc/
liked this article?
- only together we can create a truly free world
- plz support dwaves to keep it up & running!
- (yes the info on the internet is (mostly) free but beer is still not free (still have to work on that))
- really really hate advertisement
- contribute: whenever a solution was found, blog about it for others to find!
- talk about, recommend & link to this blog and articles
- thanks to all who contribute!
