Just ran this Benchmark http://serverbear.com/:
plan: http://www.hetzner.de/hosting/produkte_vserver/vq7
summary of benchmarks of this plan: http://serverbear.com/398-vserver-vq-7-hetzner#benchmarks
Benchmark results: http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/09/30/MQkkKFgyS6JyyVtS
compare it to other plans: https://dwaves.de/wp-content/misc/Top VPS by BearScore.html (sorted after BearScore)
http://serverbear.com/compare?Sort=RAM&Order=asc&Server+Type=VPS&Monthly+Cost=500000-1000000&HDD=-&RAM=500000000-1000000000&Virtualization=
System Specs
RAM |
502 MB |
HDD |
39 GB |
CPU Model |
QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0 |
CPU Cores |
1 |
CPU Speed |
3400 MHz |
CPU Cache |
4096 KB |
UnixBench
UnixBench (w/ all processors) |
1686.9 |
UnixBench (w/ one processor) |
1668.9 |
Falkenstein, Germany |
Nuremberg, Germany |
Download Speed (100MB File)
Location |
Rate |
Cachefly |
24.1 MB/s |
Linode, Atlanta, GA, USA |
2.03 MB/s |
Linode, Dallas, TX, USA |
1.69 MB/s |
Linode, Tokyo, JP |
696 KB/s |
Linode, London, UK |
9.41 MB/s |
OVH, Paris, France |
14.0 MB/s |
SmartDC, Rotterdam, Netherlands |
9.24 MB/s |
Hetzner, Nuernberg, Germany |
22.7 MB/s |
iiNet, Perth, WA, Australia |
504 KB/s |
MammothVPS, Sydney, Australia |
550 KB/s |
Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL |
3.64 MB/s |
Leaseweb, Manassas, VA, USA |
2.16 MB/s |
Softlayer, Singapore |
703 KB/s |
Softlayer, Seattle, WA, USA |
1.53 MB/s |
Softlayer, San Jose, CA, USA |
1.34 MB/s |
Softlayer, Washington, DC, USA |
2.37 MB/s |
Raw UnixBench Output
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ******************
OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.2.0-4-686-pae -- #1 SMP Debian 3.2.60-1+deb7u3
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0 (6800.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
15:52:03 up 2:01, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.04, 0.08; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 30 2014 15:52:03 - 16:20:09
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25480592.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4051.6 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7302.7 lps (29.3 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1012013.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 270197.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2384339.7 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1612631.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 374456.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18827.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10694.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1367.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1433780.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25480592.2 2183.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4051.6 736.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 7302.7 1698.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1012013.6 2555.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 270197.2 1632.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2384339.7 4110.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1612631.1 1296.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 374456.3 936.1
Process Creation 126.0 18827.6 1494.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10694.7 2522.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1367.6 2279.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1433780.7 955.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1668.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Sep 30 2014 16:20:09 - 16:48:13
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25545407.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4061.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7317.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1008427.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 272353.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2480492.7 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1606542.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 377493.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20286.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10654.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1372.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1432871.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25545407.9 2189.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4061.5 738.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 7317.2 1701.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1008427.3 2546.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 272353.9 1645.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2480492.7 4276.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1606542.4 1291.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 377493.8 943.7
Process Creation 126.0 20286.4 1610.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10654.2 2512.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1372.3 2287.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1432871.3 955.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1686.9
IOPS
I/O Pings
ioping -c 10
request=1 time=0.2 ms
request=2 time=0.4 ms
request=3 time=0.4 ms
request=4 time=0.3 ms
request=5 time=0.4 ms
request=6 time=0.3 ms
request=7 time=0.3 ms
request=8 time=0.3 ms
request=9 time=0.3 ms
request=10 time=0.4 ms
10 requests completed in 9004.9 ms, 3079 iops, 12.0 mb/s
I/O Seek Test (No Cache)
ioping -RD
9121 iops, 35.6 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.1/2.1/0.0 ms
I/O Reads – Sequential
ioping -RL
3500 iops, 874.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.1/0.3/4.1/0.1 ms
I/O Reads – Cached
ioping -RC
257511 iops, 1005.9 mb/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 0.0/0.0/0.1/0.0 ms
DD
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k conv=fdatasync
17.7697 s, 60.4 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
17.5426 s, 61.2 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=1M count=1k oflag=dsync
18.1487 s, 59.2 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=sb-io-test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
27.3914 s, 39.2 MB/s
FIO
Read IOPS |
14680.0 |
Read Bandwidth |
58.7 MB/second |
Write IOPS |
1451.0 |
Write Bandwidth |
5.8 MB/second |
Raw FIO Output
FIO random reads:
randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process
randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)
randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=7633: Tue Sep 30 15:31:02 2014
read : io=1024.3MB, bw=58722KB/s, iops=14680 , runt= 17861msec
cpu : usr=5.13%, sys=21.05%, ctx=178795, majf=0, minf=0
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=58721KB/s, minb=58721KB/s, maxb=58721KB/s, mint=17861msec, maxt=17861msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=261711/2, merge=0/1, ticks=1128912/0, in_queue=1130908, util=99.50%
Done
FIO random writes:
randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
fio-2.0.9
Starting 1 process
randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=7637: Tue Sep 30 15:34:03 2014
write: io=1024.3MB, bw=5807.2KB/s, iops=1451 , runt=180609msec
cpu : usr=0.69%, sys=2.38%, ctx=109959, majf=0, minf=0
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=0/w=0/d=262207, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=5807KB/s, minb=5807KB/s, maxb=5807KB/s, mint=180609msec, maxt=180609msec
Disk stats (read/write):
vda: ios=0/262151, merge=0/31, ticks=0/11544848, in_queue=11546448, util=100.00%
Done
Traceroute
Traceroute (cachefly.cachefly.net): traceroute to cachefly.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 ***-***.*****.*** (***.***.***.***) 1.039 ms 1.129 ms 1.049 ms
2 hos-tr1.juniper3.rz10.hetzner.de (213.239.236.65) 15.109 ms hos-tr4.juniper3.rz12.hetzner.de (213.239.236.113) 0.428 ms 0.357 ms
3 core21.hetzner.de (213.239.245.101) 0.468 ms 0.384 ms 0.544 ms
4 core4.hetzner.de (213.239.245.18) 5.094 ms 5.024 ms core4.hetzner.de (213.239.245.14) 5.115 ms
5 juniper1.ffm.hetzner.de (213.239.245.5) 5.044 ms 5.037 ms 5.064 ms
6 vip1.G-anycast1.cachefly.net (205.234.175.175) 6.192 ms 6.173 ms 6.077 ms
- only together we can create a truly free world
- plz support dwaves to keep it up & running!
- (yes the info on the internet is (mostly) free but beer is still not free (still have to work on that))
- really really hate advertisement
- contribute: whenever a solution was found, blog about it for others to find!
- talk about, recommend & link to this blog and articles
- thanks to all who contribute!